OHHH YEAH AXIL.... AND I BET THIS ONE IS ADVANCED... OR MAYBE YOU DON'T THINK ITS ADVANCED BUT YOU WON'T SEND SUCH COMMENT TO YOUR OLD FRIEND.
IF YOU WANT TO PLAY THE JUDGE THEN YOU CAN AT LEAST TRY TO HIDE YOUR CORRUPTION...
And you are irrelevant to determine whether the piece is good or not.
The moderators are.
The beauty is in the eye of the beholder and therefore I suggest that there will be a quick voting system for each piece
with negative and positive voting buttons (2 buttons).
If the piece has 5 more negative votes than positive votes, then the piece will be transferred automatically to a lower level board,
and the votings for that piece will be nullified.
Of course that double voting won't be allowed and will be enforced by saving a list of users who already voted to the specified piece.
(That list may or may not not be visible... a choise for the site designer... *The list will also be nullified after a transfer has occurred*)
Mine is just one opinion, don't worry about it.
Your idea would quickly become nothing more than a popularity contest that has little to do with the actual quality of the piece. It's stupid.
For the record, I don't think it's advanced myself. The stupid thing makes you choose before you start, so I had to make a decision. Everyone's a critic.
post comment
You need to be logged in to post a comment. If you don't have an account, sign up now!
drawn in 21 min
drawn in 33 min
drawn in 59 min
drawn in 5 min
Creepy and surrealist, best combination ever! Congrats, this drawing makes you AWESOME.
IF YOU WANT TO PLAY THE JUDGE THEN YOU CAN AT LEAST TRY TO HIDE YOUR CORRUPTION...
The moderators are.
The beauty is in the eye of the beholder and therefore I suggest that there will be a quick voting system for each piece
with negative and positive voting buttons (2 buttons).
If the piece has 5 more negative votes than positive votes, then the piece will be transferred automatically to a lower level board,
and the votings for that piece will be nullified.
Of course that double voting won't be allowed and will be enforced by saving a list of users who already voted to the specified piece.
(That list may or may not not be visible... a choise for the site designer... *The list will also be nullified after a transfer has occurred*)
Your idea would quickly become nothing more than a popularity contest that has little to do with the actual quality of the piece. It's stupid.
boner boner boner boner rump!
boner boner boner boner rump!
boner boner boner boner !