boardsintermediateWell if it was honesty you wanted
watch animation - 100% - zoom in - zoom out
drawn in 8 hours 49 min with Oekaki Shi-Painter
Artist
iconImperfect
Dabbler
Imperfect (Jun 19, 2012)
Wasn't drawing half the time, so the timer is inaccurate.
Imperfect (Jun 19, 2012)
drawn in 1 hour 15 min
Imperfect (Jun 20, 2012)
drawn in 33 min
Imperfect (Jun 20, 2012)
drawn in 1 hour 15 min
Imperfect (edited Jun 21, 2012)
drawn in 2 hours 2 min
Imperfect (Jun 20, 2012)
drawn in 1 hour 31 min
Imperfect (Jun 21, 2012)
drawn in 23 min
Imperfect (Jun 21, 2012)
drawn in 1 hour 47 min
davincipoppalag (Jun 21, 2012)
I don't know who it is..but it's a good drawing
lori (Jun 21, 2012)
quite awesome, love the skin
staci (Jun 21, 2012)
would you be more skilled if this took you 3 hours less? I don't really get the obsession with working faster. It's not like you'd sign a portrait in oils with how long it took you to do.
Imperfect (Jun 21, 2012)
Yes, actually, I think so. A more skilled artist would be able to produce as well-executed work in a shorter time period. Frankly, I'm just embarrassed about how long I take to draw sometimes.
staci (edited Jun 21, 2012)
Well, what defines 'well-executed work' ? By that logic you're saying that Axil62, who does most of his work in under 2 hours, is a more skilled artist than Artiste or Cloxboy. Does the time rule only apply to realism then? You might work on a face for hours trying to define a nose or lip to get the look just right, whereas someone with a more loose style can hint at its shape and shadow, but that's their style. You might say part of your style is how you obsess over details or the time you put into it.
Also, it's only the viewers of a web-based drawing program who's judgement you are heeding. And what about that random sandwich-make in the middle of a drawing? ;) Don't be too hard on yourself.
shults (Jun 21, 2012)
I don't get the difference between 3 and 13hrs as well, but when artists make a decent piece in under half an hour, it's usually made in a delicious, loose style, they wouldn't have achieved if they dedicated twice the amount of time ;)
Imperfect (Jun 21, 2012)
Cloxboy has some fantastic pieces under 2 hours as well. I'm not saying only artists who work faster are more skilled, just that I think artists who are more skilled have the ability to work faster, if only simply because practice does tend to improve speed. But, Staci, and shults, you have a point about each artist's style being a factor in the time taken, aside from skill. I guess it is many things, and the time isn't that important. The timer just makes me self-conscious Dx
Anyway, thanks for taking the time to look at my work :)
Flubbles (Jun 21, 2012)
I dont think art should be defined by time or price, if you like the piece. Then that's all that matters. Not eveything is judged by speed, lets take sex for example...the longer you take the better is is.
shults (Jun 21, 2012)
Or, as Sophie says, "Sex is not a carnival cruise. I'm a busy woman. You get on, you get off."
Sweetlove15 (edited Jun 21, 2012)
You were up late drawing this. Are you going to make it to your flight on time today?

I really enjoyed the animation of this. I'm happy to finally have the chance to watch and learn from you :)
Rat (Jun 21, 2012)
Man. If 2draw had a "favorites" feature, you'd be littering my page!
itchymonkey (Jun 22, 2012)
the Corgsta, if i'm not mistaken.
nice work..
how much time should it take? how much do you have?
karl (Jun 22, 2012)
i agree, time is irrelevant..my first drawing i intentionally left the applet running...it says i took 9 days haha
Teapot (edited Jun 22, 2012)
This is really fine. Love the skin and the lips and the eye wrinkles and...he has a very weird philtrum, doesn't he? Kind of looks like a baby Tom Cruise.
post comment
You need to be logged in to post a comment. If you don't have an account, sign up now!