thanx for coming to my pic to pay respects.

pretty good; you mean, android or robot? Is a cyborg part man, part robot?My sister and I have a "thing" about robot fiction, probably read ALL of Issac Asimov! Robots and part-robots are fascinating.

Science is saying, there will be grown,ready-to-use, real kidneys, for humans in 20 yrs. No more waiting for donors!!

I always wonder JUST WHAT SCIENCE thinks the future will do, anyhow? no one except the very rich will have the new kidneys.We're already on the cusp, here,in Oregon, of losing ALL FRUITS & VEGETABLES TO ONLY THE RICH!! The huge crop failures will put us on the entrance to famine-ville. Yeah, in the U.S. What a future!! just like "Soylent Green," that film is haunting. How could anyone predict humans would over-populate the earth like RABBITS? You know what they do with over-populated deer herds; time to go game-hunting!! heh. If I were a starving deer, i'd prefer the hunter. it's quicker.

It's H.R. Giger Dot.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._R._Giger

Wow, sin...that hair and those eyes and those TEETH...and..and that 'body'(he's nakid)...can I have a huge poster of this one? Thanks...don't mind if I do... ;)

looks a lot like a card I have from Magic.

all original though.

At first Glance, I thought it was Randy Quaid....LOL!

Nah this looks just like the guy that played Agent Smith. Great stuff. Sorry for late comment.

This is amazing, how could you sit at a computer for 6 hrs+ and draw this? I am utterly amazed.

it looks great, wonderful colors and lighting; as to those of you who draw and paint from photos a lot; try real people, and real things,scenes, more often. Photos are great, but they have limitations.You can only draw the picture exactly how iit's shown in the photograph. Real people and objects,& scenery are 3 dimensional, and they are harder to draw, but there is nothing like 3-dimensional REALITY to make you excercise your sight-and-drafting muscles. With 3-dimensional reality, you have to decide how you see the person or object; the lighting,color,sizes, ect.Even the style. This is done for you, often in a photo; not in the real, 3-D object. Before photography, artists had to practice SEEING THE OBJECT right from the start.What are the angles & shapes? What is the composition?How much color, dark, light, or shadow? Proportion? Don't think you can let a photograph decide all that for you, every time. With drawing & painting from reality, you make the choices and judgements, but its well worth the work.

My fav of yours in my oppinion :)

Thank you ShiShi, it is 5 years old now, did not think anyone would look at it anymore lol :)

Very Nice

This is so fantastic! Her expression is so intense, and that eye, I just want to lick it. Very very well done.

Brilliant.

I love Lascaux too only one I feel comfy using. Now if I could just do something like this with it! LOL <3 this!!!!!!!! (times a billion!)

Youse gize did gud....

Hey... I never saw this. This is great. Its very different, and I like the warmness of the picture.

Very nice, real pretty!

I agree!..did you see they are making a new Castlevania game..supposed to be really good.!

I really love his sword and how he's posing. His eyes looks evil. But, is his right eye not a bit far away from his nose?

Ganondorf Dragmiere

Amazing artwork, just thought I would bring it up, I missed it the first time :)

good job my man.

That's a nice spread

Very good... I've seen this movie several times..there was a poem in it that I liked but I can't remember it.

Fuck, I knew I should have low balled him starting at $20.

I like Staci's idea, something more like Daily Deviations would be cool. The whole 'like and dislike button system' seems like it would be counterproductive because it allows people to judge anonymously and without explanation, making the showcase purely a popularity contest (opposed to a place to display the sites more skillful or innovative or interesting digital art). And yes, judging things like this would be subjective but could be relatively objective if there was some loose criteria to be met that we all agreed on (I mean, don't most prominent and respected award systems work in such a way?).

Thinking about it now I think there are pretty solid reasons a lot of pieces were showcases like this one. There was a collective evolution of skill as 2draw developed from when I joined in 2004. There seemed to be a point where the bar was raised weekly for a few years and then we got to now where it has kind of gone stagnant. We are left to look at the current content as a whole and maybe a lot doesn't fit, but when it was showcased it was amazing, inspiring, or whatever at the time it as created.

:}