boardsbeginner<
100% - zoom in - zoom out
drawn in 32 min with Lascaux Sketch Classic
Artist
iconKloxboy
JEM Translator
Edit
» edit/delete entry
» modify users
» revise image
Kloxboy (Jan 13, 2007) — edit
```
Kloxboy (Jan 13, 2007)
drawn in 32 min
Fiesta (Jan 13, 2007)
At first I thought this was something from a harry potter. x3
Or that goose bumps movie, " The mask". :3
Its awesome. :D
lori (Jan 13, 2007)
nice Klox, I always love the lighting in your pics
Kloxboy (Jan 13, 2007)
Thanks Lori, I appreciate the compliment. I hope you don't mind, Lori, but you've just triggered a rant in me. :D

I want to clear something up for everyone who says my work has "good lighting" or that I'm "good with light". First off, most drawings and paintings that have any form or shape to them have some type of light source, so right off the bat, merely having "lighting" isn't that special. Shape, color, texture, and the positioning of the subjects I draw are the core of my work, but many people just narrow my work down to mere "lighting" effects. I think those select few people don't realize that without those fundamental drawing elements (shape, color, texture, etc.), there would be little to no light to apply to my faces, characters, demons, etc.(unless I was doing non-objective abstract art). Light sources and light intensity does play a part in most of my work but if I didn't draw my subjects with shape and form, lighting wouldn't have much of an effect, my work would be pretty flat and shapeless. I realize this rant is nit-picky but please understand that I get this "lighting" comment a lot, I want people to know that "lighting" isn't where all my efforts go into, I would say it's structure, shape, design and style that are the "body" of my work.

[end rant]
SneakyWalter (Jan 13, 2007)
Great lighting!
plasma_ooganator (Jan 13, 2007)
I think your lighting is pretty good.
lori (Jan 13, 2007)
well I never know what to say in my comments Klox, I just know what I like
cmb (Jan 13, 2007)
um? fine use of shadows? lol-I see what you mean Kloxboy ....
Kloxboy (Jan 13, 2007)
You're cool Lori. Sorry but I needed to rant, dang nab it!
Naima (Jan 13, 2007)
Nice structure, Klox ;) :-D.

You know, I wonder if the "lighting" comments turn up so frequently because that's the thing that jumps out most strongly at people - maybe because it is something that lots of people have trouble getting to look right? Just a thought - I'm only a tyro dabbler on this site and in art in general, so that might be way off base :P~. Anyway, I love your stuff!
sweet_insanity (Jan 13, 2007)
i always like your use of color, and how you can see the "strokes" of the picture, it seems to flow and carries great texture.
that and the interesting twisted features XD
davincipoppalag (Jan 13, 2007)
My turn.. I have to say some of us don't have much knowledge of art, and its terminology..so we say we like this or that about a particular picture just because that's all we know how to say. I like this too, I like the exaggerated features, and yes.. I like the light too.. You rock , Klox...ok I'm done too
marcello (Jan 14, 2007)
On the other hand klox, one could comment that lighting is the only thing that makes any picture good. if there were no light, the image would be blank. a lot of our understanding of shape, form, and texture is based on how light reflects off things. of course, if one were to make an image represent form, shape and texture without light (ie, just abstracting the physical feeling somehow), that would be a whole other animal (arguably modern/abstract art attempts to do this, though maybe not with the same intent).

I think people like the fact that you tend to use more than one light source or have very little ambient light, giving your pictures a more dramatic feeling. Something that I think more people should try doing (self included).
post comment
You need to be logged in to post a comment. If you don't have an account, sign up now!