Now that I think of it, neither the chicken nor the egg comes first, because they both get out of their mother at the same time, since there is always an embryo chicken inside the egg. >:)
|XOD|
eggsactly....(sorry had to) whether its a bird/reptile/fish/mammal/etc...life starts off as an egg whether it be inside or outside the body of whatever it came from.
Where is the proof for evolution. They have never found any "links". The links they claimed to have found turned out to be diseased individuals.
As for the big bang theory there are several problems with that therory.
1.Were did that first molecule or atom come from how did it expand?
2.The therory goes against a simple fact nothing gets better.
3.. Helium-4 is created by radioactive decay and is constantly added to the atmosphere. Helium is not light enough to escape the Earth's gravity (unlike hydrogen), and it will therefore accumulate into large quantities over time. The current level of helium in the atmosphere would accumulate in 200,000 years or less. So if this is true, the Earth must be young. Not billions of years old.
where is the proof of evolution? could say the same about god...and other things. wheres the proof that any of these exist? (is the proof telling the truth?)
there are always going to be problems with theories until facts are presented. visual facts and not just writings in some book.
the evolution of man has some firm proof. for instance- they've found skeletons. plus if you look at DNA, alot of the codes in human DNA are similar to other animal's DNA, therefore there must have been a species many thousands of years ago that some evolved into another type of species, and others that evolved into something else. its a mixture of educational thought and logic. but you can't actually 100% say yes it does exist or has existed until you've seen it with your own eyes.
as for the begining of earth, who knows?? how do we know that there was ever a begining? or how it began if it did have a begining? if thats true about helium, then explain about the dinosaurs??? scientists have calculated that they lived millions of years ago, not 200,000 years or less. after all the big bang is just a theory...theories aren't facts.
post comment
You need to be logged in to post a comment. If you don't have an account, sign up now!
drawn in 33 min
drawn in 26 min
|XOD|
|XOD|
drawn in 27 min
|XOD|
drawn in 11 min
so yeah!
drawn in 16 min
drawn in 22 min
drawn in 21 min
drawn in 55 min
As for the big bang theory there are several problems with that therory.
1.Were did that first molecule or atom come from how did it expand?
2.The therory goes against a simple fact nothing gets better.
3.. Helium-4 is created by radioactive decay and is constantly added to the atmosphere. Helium is not light enough to escape the Earth's gravity (unlike hydrogen), and it will therefore accumulate into large quantities over time. The current level of helium in the atmosphere would accumulate in 200,000 years or less. So if this is true, the Earth must be young. Not billions of years old.
there are always going to be problems with theories until facts are presented. visual facts and not just writings in some book.
the evolution of man has some firm proof. for instance- they've found skeletons. plus if you look at DNA, alot of the codes in human DNA are similar to other animal's DNA, therefore there must have been a species many thousands of years ago that some evolved into another type of species, and others that evolved into something else. its a mixture of educational thought and logic. but you can't actually 100% say yes it does exist or has existed until you've seen it with your own eyes.
as for the begining of earth, who knows?? how do we know that there was ever a begining? or how it began if it did have a begining? if thats true about helium, then explain about the dinosaurs??? scientists have calculated that they lived millions of years ago, not 200,000 years or less. after all the big bang is just a theory...theories aren't facts.