forumsdrawing discussionthink time
  icon
two-na (Mar 15, 2009)
It deserves remarking on the irony that the reaction to concepts accompanying their graphic representations exist0rs(minus klox,axil) who utilize the 2draw website have created have enacted a despicable contention from the community(inclusively) that is now well defined(if actions define individuals) despite the overwhelming evidence surrounding, if you care to look, that the most agreed with racist society-prison-members are not necessarily happy or wealthy, and conversely that the less successful racists don't necessarily inhibit other people's ability to think for themselves.
  icon
lori (edited Mar 16, 2009)
in simpler terms please? I'm not noticing any racism on 2draw, and what do Klox and Axil have to do with it? and I don't think anyone on the site inhibits other people's ability to think, I just see a bunch of people expressing themselves
 
Elementalist (Mar 16, 2009)
That's one helluva run-on sentence.
  icon
two-na (Mar 16, 2009)
Okay, so many people live in Squirrel Town, Ohio, or Texas. Hickvilleness is still a problem in this so called country and it is more than ever a `Human-Rights' issue. That there even exists society-prison-members that flock with their cheerful eyes unaware of what they are doing
lori:[...]I just see a bunch['a] people expressing themselves
. If the opinions expressed up to this point are valuable observations about reality to you, the value of your life has become suspect. The 2draw website allows its members to post their artwork to the public--other members can post their very thoughtful comments of the work. Please remind yourself of this, you have to live with the other people in your community. Give up obsolete racism that may harm you by allowing the mentally-ill-who-label to down-mod your reputation. The public can remain anonymous while members choosing to post their thoughtful comments will be attacked by the squirrels and rodents who want to cause harm to one another. Do you have any idea how that looks? You look like a bad person, or you don't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity_training Recognize the diversity, look into the future, be proactive. Come on people!
  icon
staci (Mar 16, 2009)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 16, 2009)
What happens when you put a handful of crayons in a pot and melt them? After a while they become one color and you cant tell one from another. They are one. America is the great melting pot (or so it was supposed to be), not the great diversity pot. I say yes, come to America, do it legally and become American, not African American or Mexican American or Asian American... just American. Assimilate. On an unrelated note.....

By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

The furor over the huge federal spending under President Obama - a $1.75 trillion deficit, 13 percent - obscures an even more basic question: Does he know what he is doing?

That is, does he know how to do anything other than spend?

His stimulus package, of course, took no special ability: He left the details to Democrats in Congress. But his two other major initiatives - his banking and mortgage-relief plans - are both flawed and unlikely to solve their respective problems.

Indeed, they're so wide of the mark as to prompt questions not of Obama's ideology but of his basic competence.

The bank-bailout plan seems to be largely stillborn. Having wished that the private sector would flock to invest in toxic assets if offered the right incentives, the Treasury secretary is still hoping. Crossing his fingers seems to have replaced effective policy in his planning.

To date, no massive infusion of private-sector capital seems in view and Washington is doing little more than writing checks to prop up the failing banks. That doesn't take a genius. But the difficult task of relieving the banks of toxic assets so they can rekindle the flow of loans seems to be beyond the ability of the president and his administration.

Perhaps Obama privately isn't so concerned about the banks or the businesses that need the credit markets restored. Those are Republican interest groups, right? But he surely must want his mortgage-rescue plan to work - the homeowners facing foreclosure tend to be Democratic constituents.

But this plan, too, falls far short of the mark.

Incredibly, it excludes anyone who has lost their job and can't afford to make their payments even if they were to spend 31 percent of their income trying to do so. If you can't come close to affording your mortgage, even if only because of a (hopefully temporary) loss of employment, forget about it: Obama is not going to help you.

Nor will he help you if your mortgage exceeds your home's value. One out of five mortgages now falls into this category - and the continued fall in property values will put more and more homeowners in it. But they can expect no help from Obama's rescue plan.

Why would a liberal be so callous? Why would he leave so many out in the cold? Could it be that the administration simply can't figure out how to help these folks? That the president couldn't devise a counter to his financial advisers, who presumably wanted to exclude these folks?

It was Clinton-era Housing Secretary Henry Cisneros who urged Fannie Mae to spend 42 percent of its money buying mortgages for lower-income people and who suggested that they no longer require down payments. And it was his successor, Andrew Cuomo, who upped the ante to 50 percent of the Fannie Mae portfolio.

After Democrats inveigled people to buy homes they could not afford, how can they justify passing a plan that excludes them from assistance?

It appears that Obama is at sea when it comes to financial policy, economic-recovery planning and credit-rescue efforts. We're stuck not only with a socialist but seemingly an incompetent one.
  icon
enjoydotcom (edited Mar 16, 2009)
I consider myself as a smart person, who reads, understands and writes the English language extremely well for a non-English language person. But really, I have no idea what you are saying two-na in your first post, I know what the words mean, but not what you're getting at.
Racism, to judge a person based on their racial background, usually done in a degrading way. I might have been wearing a pink pair of glasses, but I've not noticed something like that here (@2draw community) . I have noticed political debates, which i usually do not participate in because I have virtually no funded meaning regarding current US politics. Some might have exchanged harsh words, but is that racism? Or even discrimination?
  icon
two-na (edited Mar 16, 2009)
What makes the question `does he know what he is doing?' a basic question?; it is a direct attack of his character.
The article goes on to acquire more disdain from`Obama's competency'-questioners with the explanation that pursuing the economy via federal spending would be a mistake.
What are you holding onto, that you cannot also question that if no systems of control exist to help the `market' don't you think the money earned by the private-sector Must be put to better use?
This is a new administration that reserves the right to focus on one issue before moving onto another. The question is `when do you stop looking at the appearance of crossing fingers, than yielding to the paradox that by caring about the systems of control that bind you less, you will achieve better results?'
  icon
jpjp1052 (edited Mar 16, 2009)
two-na, The bottom line is - one is either a capitalist (one who believes in self-support and freedom from government) or a socialist (one who expects the government to take care of him from cradle to grave). It sounds like you are a socialist. P.S. Once the government gets you dependent on it for everything, you've lost your freedom.
  icon
two-na (Mar 16, 2009)
You cannot lie and insist that the systems of control did not exist before you; that you aren't a cog; i.e., a person who thinks that ideas can be owned or originated. The bottom line is this: there is no control--and, now that your dichotomy is nullified, you must be the person A who survives in a world that favors A. How are you anything but a vessel that is used for all The Other can exploit you for(work, money)?
So what if the system of how any John Do can succeed in this life is objectified? Is there a benefit in allowing people like you who try to legislate either-or paradigms to stand above the rest?
  icon
jpjp1052 (Mar 16, 2009)
Socialists are people who are afraid of (or inept at) supporting themselves, so they expect everyone else to support them. Is this you?
Also, can you speak English so we can understand what you are trying to say?
  icon
two-na (edited Mar 16, 2009)
The human race can not be split into two distinct clubs, winners and losers. Stop putting up a facade of normalcy to cover up your inner despair.
The irony is that you can forget about your bogus game that `some people are inept [at] supporting themselves', and the individual would not be stifled by the pressure to succeed.

Though, it may grant you immediate gratification knowing that people who also put up this blind spot to obvious-reality will agree with you.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 16, 2009)
two-na: Is English your second language? You attempt to express your convoluted, fragmented half baked views on things you don't really know much about with words you cannot quite figure out how to use.
  icon
jpjp1052 (Mar 16, 2009)
You sound like you would just like to go live in a hippy commune. You would flourish there- making paper flower bouquets. Peace brother.
  icon
two-na (edited Mar 16, 2009)
Further, the same fear of failure drives others to try too hard and stand above all other people(to be the best), wasting their life swotting over unnecessary topics. They can't concentrate anymore. They blame others. All because they believe the myth that the ability to support yourself separates winners from losers.
Human beings are not the best thing to have happened to this world, the disease must not spread any farther.
It's not surprising that some people are labeled by you type A society-prison-members as inept. They can't tolerate the levels of unnecessary pain.
  icon
jpjp1052 (edited Mar 16, 2009)
In America, it's your choice to be independent (true freedom) or dependent (subservient). In many other countries, you don't have that choice, the choice is made for you - dependent.
We just want to continue to have the choice in America.
  icon
Flubbles (Mar 16, 2009)
The trouble is the world is evolving to quickly, and many mistakes are going to be made before we get it right! People can point finger's and blame others, but were all responsible for whats happened with the econamy, and there's no quick fix solution! Nobody really has any idea what need's to be done next either.We just keep digging the hole deeper for generations to come.
  icon
Kloxboy (Mar 16, 2009)
This "think time" discussion reminds me of an episode of Family Guy I recently saw:

Peter: "I read a book about this sort of thing once."
Brian: "Are you sure it was a 'book'? Are you sure it wasn't 'nothing'?"
Peter: "Oh yeah."
  icon
QTgillie (Mar 16, 2009)
My husband, a die-hard republican at heart, stated the other day that, "What this country needs is for the government to purchase GM, and use the company to research our selves from dependence on petrolium. I never would have guessed he would say something like that, but I think that makes sense. Our contries largest problem to date, is our dependence on foriegn oil. Fix that, and everything else should self correct. Yes, we cancel eachother out every election, but not this one. George W. is the reason for this mess and it is WAY too early to start blaming Obama for our countries woes.
  icon
Flubbles (Mar 16, 2009)
It reminds me of a saved by the bell episode i once saw! when the girls and boys have a competition to see who gets the P.E money , the boys said the girls dont need any p.e money because sports are for boys (A sexist comment according to jessie) , so they ended up having a competition including a cook off and a catchphrase quiz! screech lets it slip out that the boys cheated at the cook off, so the girls decide to do a limbo to decide the winner, which the girls ended up winning.
  icon
Alter.Native (Mar 17, 2009)
staci's comment sums up this thread nicely.
  icon
HiroDaZero (Mar 17, 2009)
minesweeper the movie
  icon
two-na (Mar 19, 2009)
Kloxboy (2 days 23 hours ago) This[...]
Excellent point. The way you treat others is the most important thing.
If you take a plain look at the world, you can sum the entirety of this thread in the example.
Why discontinue caring about the important topics? Does this situation provide a chance for a new beginning and end?
This man dislikes the symptoms of a confused nation. Okay, good analysis. Has anything changed?
It's happened before, you are offered a new chance to reject it again. So?
  icon
transienthobo (Mar 21, 2009)
two-na. Im very glad you are here to display the other side of this coin. I have been reading some of the opinions posted in this website regarding the new administration. The sad thing is, one out-dated-old man would post his old view about how things should be and the rest of the sheep just nods their head in agreement.

I suggest, growing up, stop dividing yourselves into teams and parties like high-school kids, and rooting for one or the other and START seeing each other as one, American or what have you and pick each other up and work together instead of bitching about how this Team A sucks and Team B would be so much better. You are all in the same stupid melting pot. Throw away your baseless pride. None of you are americans, you or your ancestors all immigrated there and pushed the true inhabitants of that land to the side. Nationalism is waste of energy and time. Stick to drawing!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V510t0ecluY

  icon
davincipoppalag (Mar 21, 2009)
I like pizza
  icon
Kloxboy (Mar 21, 2009)
transienthobo: I agree that the "Team A vs Team B" mentality isn't doing anyone any good, this is true. That been said, I can safely say these arguments will not stop. Pending people stop having opposing views, opinions, beliefs, etc, this battle of words will continue. Is anyone making any progress with these arguments? Or are these arguments making things "worse"? Maybe, maybe not but they're not going to stop anytime soon.



  icon
QTgillie (Mar 21, 2009)
How true Klox.
  icon
transienthobo (Mar 21, 2009)
i whole heartedly agree, klox. this arguement will never stop cuz' it's not in people to get over their petty differences. it's hard-wired. The only good thing this exchange of words will probably serve is to balance the information being spewed out so everyone can decide for themselves. In any case, i agree with you, this whole thing is moot. History will keep repeating itself because we never truly learn.

anyway, peace & love!
  icon
staci (Mar 21, 2009)
people that have a strong voice/opinion and better yet take action on those principles that they so heartily believe in, are a million times more respectable/admirable than the person who just says 'OH WELL GUESS PEOPLE WILL NEVER CHANGE I GIVE UP'. even when that opinion differs from mine.
  icon
davincipoppalag (Mar 21, 2009)
I still like pizza , I dont care what anyone thinks
  icon
Kloxboy (Mar 21, 2009)
Good point Staci. I wouldn't say this discussion was moot. True, it's not very organized but I think it has some relevance, even generally speaking. There's an obvious communication gap here and a lot of ad hominem arguments being made. A little humility and kindness would probably help all parties involved. At any rate, I'm going to go make dinner and then it's back to work. I'm writing a book on how to integrate socialism and atheism into small-town America. I've titled the book "I Am The Liberal Agenda! (And So Can You)".
  icon
transienthobo (Mar 21, 2009)
LOL! I want a copy klox!
Staci, ignore my morose facade --i've grown slightly bitter due to experiences.
Dave what kinda pizza? cuz' if it's got anchovies on it, i'm on board! :P
  icon
davincipoppalag (Mar 21, 2009)
Ewww. anchovies.. what are you.. part of team A???? lol..
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 21, 2009)
transienthobo: I was just wondering, If all that crap you said was just a "morose facade" or false front, maybe you'd like to share with us the actual truth about how you see things? I mean, I don't quite understand how one so passionately expresses themselves and then says in, effect "Just kiddn, that was all just a front." Or maybe I do understand. Maybe you don't stand for anything and you'll say whatever you think will gain you favor in the eyes of those whom you'd like approval from. If Klox or Staci came on and said that they changed their minds and maybe Obama is all wrong, I have a feeling you'd come back with something along the lines of "Well..yeah, yeah that's what I meant too...I just...ya know, I mean... it was just me being morose and putting up a facade". Grow a spine you guttless turd.
  icon
transienthobo (Mar 21, 2009)
Actually, the "morose facade" is directed towards me saying, in my gloomy comment about how people will never learn and history will keep repeating itself. If i genuinely believe that, i wouldn't be here; i'd have slashed my wrist forever ago. As far as everything else, that's truly what i believe in. Don't assume, you know what they say about people who assumes things.

i couldn't care less what any of you think of me. I'm not here, to make friends and what any of you think of me, will make no relevance cuz' who are any of you to me? exactly!
  icon
davincipoppalag (Mar 21, 2009)
Musora bolagewala nekeiamba nobbediak wushkanna mekendo boanz . Uremo congemotta bewakio ngamea bruzeedem!!
  icon
transienthobo (Mar 21, 2009)
oh yeah, you're a gutless turd. lol. just sinking to your level of intelligence there.
  icon
jpjp1052 (Mar 22, 2009)
In Venezuela, Chavez seized the seaports & airstrips. In the U.S., Obama plans to seize the banks, financial institutions & other companies. Anyone see the similarities?
http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/03/22/america/22regulate.php
  icon
lori (edited Mar 23, 2009)
that is over my head jpjp.... I wanna go a day of living without seeing or hearing the name Obama - everything that happens in my household.. my father says, "it's ok, Obama will take care of it" or "let's just bask in the Glowbama" Help me Jesus! When is he gonna do something that makes sense? That's what I wanna know. Like, this would be a good headline to wake up to in the morning, "Obama finds Osama", although I would tend to question what he'd do with him if he ever did
  icon
davincipoppalag (Mar 23, 2009)
Probably nominate him for Commerce Secretary
  icon
lori (Mar 23, 2009)
I was just watching a video of Obama on 60 minutes, telling why he thinks it makes sense to free Guatanamo prisoners.. in effect he's saying "the way it was before created more mayhem and anger" hello?? Earth to Obama.... we don't live in Mr. Roger's neighborhood
  icon
Suntan (edited Mar 23, 2009)
I'm so afraid and worried, I can't even tell you how much. I don't have a good feeling about the President, either. :(
  icon
lori (edited Mar 23, 2009)
I'm not so much afraid and worried, as I am pissed off... it normally takes alot to piss me off, but he has me so on edge as more and more of a picture of what he is doing to us unfolds before my eyes.. I'm seeing this huge picture now that is blowing me away - he is putting everyone, weak and strong, in a position of helplessness... he doesn't even want to allow us to use our regular condom brands now, now he wants to only have cheap Chinese condoms for sale(which does nothing for the American economy and is something that you wouldn't think would even be on his mind right now).... he is NOT ok.. and Cloxboy can't convince me otherwise and no one else can either .. I want a President I can look up to and respect for a change.
  icon
Suntan (Mar 23, 2009)
Right..I'm not going to be convinced either by him. I have to be proven to, and I want to have the "give him a chance attitude", but I'm not getting there. I don't want to see the person who is suppose to be running the country, snickering about the economy, or on late night talk shows using Special Olympics ability as an excuse for his freaking bowling talent. I don't give a sh!t about him doing that even a little! AND..I wondered how the Kennedy family felt about that Special Olympic remark. I've wondered why they let him get away with it, actually. Maybe I missed Ted or Caroline, screaming about his sister/aunt and their family's cause for people with special needs.
Yeah, I've been pissed, too, but I've come to the conclusion that it doesn't get me anywhere and has a carry-over, that I don't like, to other people I see everyday...so, I try to just concentrate on just the worry and fear of the future that I am feeling and how I'm going to survive...because now he's attacking teaching.
  icon
Miss_DJ (Mar 23, 2009)
I have been reading some of the opinions posted in this website regarding the new administration. The sad thing is, one out-dated-old man would post his old view about how things should be and the rest of the sheep just nods their head in agreement
-transcienthobo..

I'm not sure who the "old man" is in your statement, Hobo...but I can assure you that if I agreed with this individual, it is because he holds the same views that I do, and NOT because I am a sheep nodding my head in agreement.
If the "old man" is who I 'think' he might be in your opinion...then at least I can say this on his behalf; At LEAST when he expresses his views he can do so in a manner that is concise, deliberate and easily understood by the masses, regardless of whether or not they agree.
On the other hand, there's Miss/Mr Two-na, sounding like he/she got a dictionary for Christmas, throwing words together with "I'm a stoner, duh.." ideas. The saddest result of that being it appears that Two-na actually feels proud for having stated something "profound, man..."

...when in fact it's just a bunch of gibberish.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
A Democrat's Confession

I voted Democrat because I love the fact that I can soon marry whatever I want. I've decided to marry my horse.
I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.
I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
I voted Democrat because I want the government to dictate who my doctor should be.
I voted Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.
I voted Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust that the bad guys will stop what they're doing because they now think we're good people.
I voted Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.
I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.
I voted Democrat because I'm not concerned about the slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as THEY see fit.
I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
I voted Democrat because I don't want to see a nativity scene at our courthouse lawn during "holiday time."
I voted Democrat because I believe that the way to solve our financial crisis is to print trillions of dollars so we can have high speed rail from Disneyland to Las Vegas.
I voted Democrat because I want the government to run all big businesses since they do such a good job with the post office.
I voted Democrat because I really want France to like us.
I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my rectum that it is unlikely that I'll ever have another point of view.
  icon
Miss_DJ (Mar 23, 2009)
I wish that confession was a little less accurate. It's a pity that denial has such a grip on so many people.
  icon
two-na (edited Mar 23, 2009)
Whether or not deliberately expressed,
there is a certain amount of projection emanating from the Miss_DJ figure in the disguise of a very thoughtful comment.
Miss_DJ clearly outlines the dangers of not knowing the limits of competing threads arising in dualistic thought.
Pay attention to the `do' in life: What you are doing when you are saying _blank_,
and if you are saying what you mean at all is another question.
Consciously, the post means to do some damage-by-corrupting
the offering of a new chance to confirm the failures
of the Members and Products of the Old System. As was the Author's original idea.
Miss_DJ would have it otherwise. By ignoring the `process',
one of the Pivoting Points that Gleaned from this forum:
the way you treat others as the most important thing.(At least from a transactional perspective.)
`She who is in charge of his own result'. Who believes in determinism of the present.
Absconding others in an ongoing effort to rid the earth of freedom-of-thought-and-how-to-accomplish-it, in clear determination:
Miss_DJ (50 min ago)
Hobo...but I can assure you that if I agreed with this individual, it is because he holds the same views that I do, and NOT because I am a sheep nodding my head in agreement.
Indeed, Miss_DJ is in the business of telling others what to do(how to feel).
From a transactional perspective: how you treat others;
Miss_DJ's post clearly hopes to demolish this idea forever(if there is such a thing:).
That is strange pity for a landscape artist. Not to discredit an artist from their work.
Who would do such a thing to Miss_DJ?
Is this some doing of a person led superfluous, forgetting the choices they have made long ago in the past; forgetting the whole? Unconsciously, by seeking to prove her argument--though it seems to be lacking--
`to the discredit of the author from his result or blame' it suddenly becomes unclear who [s-he] is attacking.
  icon
lori (edited Mar 23, 2009)
I can't even pretend to follow you two-na, I'm sorry...and I'm not getting into the every Democrat is a loser state of mind... I don't believe in that.. there are smart Democrats who are still in touch with reality
Suntan, I hear you... the anger is getting me nowhere besides energizing me to do more, and I'm so close to trying to figure out some way out of my hole I've been in for years... but at the same time.. if Obama doesn't think anything of people in the Special Olympics, or babies that are born when they weren't planned for...(he thinks they should die)... well.. I'm not sure where I, being bipolar stand ... and what he'll do to me and "my kind" by the time he's done. I'm sorry he's attacking teaching... the last I heard about that was him wanting kids to have longer school days and years, but haven't heard much more about it so I'm not sure where you stand.... It seems he wants the opposite of everything as it was
  icon
jpjp1052 (Mar 23, 2009)
People who talk like two-na are usually uneducated or undereducated, but they try to use big words and convoluted sentences to try to sound educated and impress others. My advice to them is to get an education, and then they can express themselves better.
If you want to persuade others to your viewpoint, you need to communicate coherently.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
jpjp1052: I read two-na's last post and thought about trying to explain exactly what you just explained.
What a convoluted mess. It's like poorly strung together thoughts and fragments of ideas that twist themselves into tight little circles and then finally come out at a dead end all the while doing a piss poor imitation of an attempt at communication.

I think if Obama has his way with education teachers will be required to read script from a teleprompter as apposed to having an idea of their own and teaching it.
  icon
two-na (Mar 23, 2009)
while not understood
goto 1;
1, read the post;
And what are you `doing' when you say that?
Consciously, you seek to prove the problem is about something else.
Unconsciously, you attempt to discredit the author from his result or blame.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
I rest my case, your honor.
  icon
davincipoppalag (Mar 23, 2009)
He was looking at the wrong teleprompter
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
HAHA! I hate it when you're actually funny, Dave.
  icon
two-na (Mar 23, 2009)
So people find someone they can make fun of.
They need it.
The value of their life is questionable.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
Yes and as where the idea (as it is now then) can also be one of which it is not.
1: As in the example that is where to for in your minds as a people or person to which it is not.
And B: Society looks to the other as a scape goat to which it is not except as seen by others.
  icon
two-na (edited Mar 23, 2009)
Or--if you wanted to actually do it--here's how:
{interjection}, as if anything has changed. Here's why not:
1. The intrusive message you want to say
A,B,C, an enumerated list of points in support of your argument.
But, if the only focus of your statement is it's defense, perhaps you should refresh your acquaintance with principle concepts. If you have any rights at all.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
two-na: You belong on bowling team Obama. Seriously, I'm convinced that you have some sort of certifiable mental disability.
  icon
lori (Mar 23, 2009)
I'm gonna go take my pills now.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
I'm gonna smoke cigarettes and drink coffee.
  icon
lori (Mar 23, 2009)
I don't like what you just said to two-na. Now you're being a prick just like Obama.
  icon
Miss_DJ (Mar 23, 2009)
two-na.....my saying I am NOT a sheep isn't taking away from anyone's lovely right to equate me with such. Now, because my life is so incredibly rich and full, I'm not allowing another second of it to be spent in this 'verbal racquetball' with a mentally-challenged opponent. (not, of course to diss anyone else who may be mentally challenged, I mean jeez, many of those individuals are delightful to communicate with!)

Mr./Ms. 'Fish,' I find you, Sir or Madam, to be too full of yourself to even bother with.
Go talk to the mirror...I'm sure you do that regularly anyway.
  icon
lori (Mar 23, 2009)
I will try to ignore that Miss DJ, though that was one of the snottiest things I've ever read... I am mentally challenged and so are you, so get over yourself. There is not one person on this planet that couldn't walk into a head doctor's office and be diagnosed with something, so you think about that. None of you people have any right to put yourselves on a level higher than someone else like that.
  icon
Miss_DJ (edited Mar 23, 2009)
Lori,
My apologies, Lori...I needed to say Socially Challenged. That would have been more accurate. I don't appreciate people that "play" with other people. I see two-na as doing that throughout the thread. I have nothing against mentally challenged people. You're right, I agree that we are all to some extent, either emotionally or mentally ill in some respect or another.

Donna
  icon
lori (Mar 23, 2009)
ok
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
I've been to a few head doctors in my time and I've never been diagnosed with anything. For years I thought I was an alcoholic , turns out I'm not.
  icon
lori (Mar 23, 2009)
I already gave you your label, it's on your profile :P no really, I still adore that humorous side of you
  icon
Miss_DJ (edited Mar 23, 2009)
ok...a whole lot of people could use a little help in the mind department. With the exception of Axil.

  icon
QTgillie (Mar 23, 2009)
Which is to say, that if a + b = c then a = c - b and b = c - a and also if ab=c then a = c/b and b = c/a And it is impossible to divide any number by zero, but zero times any number is zero and one times any number is always that number. Now, don't ever tell anyone here that I did not teach you all something.
  icon
Flubbles (edited Mar 23, 2009)
Even two-na knew that.Did you know that while praying mantis are mating the female bites the males head off.No one knows why, but it could be to do with the protein from the male body helps the eggs develope.Also praying mantis have excellent eyesight and can see up to 60 feet away.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 23, 2009)
Did anyone get my fuckin two-na joke up there? That was some funny shit. Now start laughing!
  icon
Flubbles (Mar 23, 2009)
I wanna know where the tickets are on sale for you next stand up tour dude.
  icon
HiroDaZero (Mar 24, 2009)
Superfluous verbiage necessitates apropos castigation. ;D
  icon
Suntan (Mar 24, 2009)
Axil: I'm taking the teacher/teleprompter material to work with me. They'll give it some mileage. ;)
  icon
lori (Mar 24, 2009)
they have "whiteboards" at my son's school that they use to do all their lessons.. just tap the board and it goes to a new page of info. What happened to chalkboards?
  icon
Suntan (Mar 24, 2009)
Right, they're called Smart Boards. He/ the teacher can write on them, too..tap the writing and it turns into a font. No more..."I can't read your writing." Black boards are still used, but for some, just for daily "do now" that stays up on the board. There is a new major in some colleges called Educational Technology for everything that is coming out. We have to stay current because the kids certainly have to move with it all. Sometimes teachers use blogs as journals now, too. The kids love it.
  icon
lori (edited Mar 24, 2009)
yeah, I understand the need to stay current but that traditional side of me wants everything to get back to basics - the kids barely know what basic is.. lol, I always call them whiteboards for some reason
  icon
Miss_DJ (Mar 24, 2009)
Hiro, I love ya.
  icon
Flubbles (Mar 25, 2009)
Whats the difference in somebody calling dave an ass clown to you calling two-na mentally challenged miss dj?
  icon
Miss_DJ (Mar 25, 2009)
Two-na took a "slam" at me before I referred to him as mentally challenged. I reciprocated in kind. (what I should have called him was socially challenged, I didn't intend to diss the mentally challenged people of this world in any way).

However, I didn't draw a picture of him and call him an ass clown when he had never done anything wrong to deserve it. Hence the difference.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 25, 2009)
Nope, that's not it. Try again.
  icon
Miss_DJ (Mar 25, 2009)
who asked you Axil.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 25, 2009)
I wasn't aware that these boards were by invitation only.
  icon
Miss_DJ (Mar 25, 2009)
I thought Flubbles had asked me a question, Axil. My answer is intended for him. Bye bye now...have a pleasant evening...that's what I'm doing. I'm done with the 2draw shenanigans for today.
  icon
Axil62 (Mar 25, 2009)
Alrighty then, I will. It was fun. We'll talk later.
 
post reply
You need to be logged in to post a comment. If you don't have an account, sign up now!